The Technomoralist Mandate
If the "Technophilosopher Kings" promise a future of limitless expansion, the Technomoralist demands a defensive architecture. Humanity needs an SLA for the Living Subject — a perimeter of infrastructure that ensures the value of Compute serves the living, not the machine.
Sovereignty-Level-Agreement (v1.0)
- Availability: Primary control remains human-authorized.
- Latency: Refutation of "Systemic Serfdom" lag.
- Security: Cryptographic isolation of the Identity Stack.
- Provenance: Node ownership via technical necessity.
We must look to the laws of physics and technical necessity as our only guidelines. A machine does not flatter; a protocol does not lie. By securing the physical and logical dependencies of our lives — the raw Compute, the private keys, the sovereign domains — we move from being "users" of a system to being the Author of our own nature.
Identity Sovereignty Audit
Authorship verified via the Identity Stack. Any communication not signed by the following key is a hallucination or a deepfake.
PGP Fingerprint:
352F F2B9 6E13 4595 A426 02C0 1343 1305 4AFA 7B26
SHA256 Integrity Hash (.asc):
35fcce5775a7d60af4058134afd1cffdcc65783f5fb3516d3e1031a3819bfc43
Download Public Key (.asc)
[Node 01 Continuity Protocol: Master Revocation Key is airgapped and physically isolated. Identity persistence is anchored in technical necessity, not platform permission.]